Independence Day
US Marines raising the flag on Iwo Jima.
It’s time for another rant that is completely unrelated to the theme of this blog because I just felt like it. Fourth of July just ended a few hours ago for the folks in the Land of the Free. While dropping in and out of consciousness during a particularly boring Maths lecture on integration and volume of a disk of revolution, my mind wandered and — by a random firing of neurons — I ended up thinking about the birthday of what is, or was, arguably the greatest nation in the world.
Warning: Long Rant Ahead.
Indeed, it wasn’t that long ago when the name America symbolized the triumph of human ideals and the collective might of free-will beings in the heart of a young and impressionable boy living on the other side of this spherical hunk of rock. You know, like in the movie Independence Day when President Whitmore said, “today, we (the people of the world) celebrate our Independence Day”?
That used to be America.
The inspiring speech made by Ronald Reagan, one of the greatest Republicans ever lived, at the Berlin Wall had its 20th anniversary marked just a month ago. As he spoke to the people of West Germany and the rest of Western Europe, he spoke to a generation of people who rose out of the postwar ruins and rebuilt their countries with the aid of the Marshall Plan, the greatest postwar rebuilding master plan ever formulated and a distant reminder of America’s diplomatic success. When Ronald Reagan, addressing the General Secretary of the Soviet Union, said, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”, it resonated in the hearts of millions of Westerners living in freedom and millions more who longed for it.
Where did that America go? The more I hear of Mr. Bush Junior, the more firmly I believe that it must be somewhere really, really far away.
The fall of the Berlin Wall.
Perhaps America has always been the political shithole that it is today and perhaps I was misled into believing tales of the nation’s past greatness by Hollywood’s many WWII offerings. Perhaps it was due to the fact that at a young and naive age of ten, I was reading all the Tom Clancy novels I could get my hands on. But even if the truth does often turn out to be less inspiring than the sanitized accounts of history, I still believe that America was once closer to its founding ideals than it is today.
The United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights owes a lot of its birth to the American ideals of freedom and equality, ideals that are enshrined in the nation’s consitution. This constitution is the basis of the Union and represents the hopes and aspirations of a nation of people who had just tasted the sweet nectar of freedom. This is also the very same constitution that was dismissed by Mr. Bush as “just a piece of paper” not too long ago. How did it come this far?
A portion of the Bill of Rights.
The cynical side of us can argue that ultimately America’s past acts of benevolence were inspired by its own selfish interests. I believe that is not true. There are always people who lie with a straight face and who manipulate and deceive to further their own interests. But similarly, there too will always be people who truly believe in the greater goods of humanity. America’s decision to finally enter WWII was not one of pure altruistic intentions, but it is simply absurd to compare it to today’s Operation Iraqi Freedom. There might have been individual acts of selfishness, cruelty and moral ambiguity, just as there continues to be in today’s armed conflicts, but WWII, for the Americans, was undeniable a “good war”.
America was never flawless, but its people fought hard to stay true to the ideals of its founding fathers. The civil rights movements of the 20th century came to be only because America’s ideology environment enabled its birth. There continues to be racism and injustice even today, and indeed they may never disappear completely, but a huge part of the American way of life is the struggle itself. Today, in a nation described as secular by its constitution, the President publicly called the war on terrorism a “crusade” and his father, the ex-President, said that “atheists are not citizens or patriots“. To hell (literally?) with the founding fathers and their silly ideas about separation of church and state, eh?
Thomas Jefferson is spinning in his grave now.
But there’s a catch that Mr. Bush and religious fundamentalists should keep in mind: America’s greatness for the past fifty years was largely thanks to the huge advancements it spearheaded in the various fields of science and technology. And here’s some food for thought: according to a recent study in American Scientist, an overwhelming 80% of the leading scientists in American are strict atheist and only 5% holds a traditional view of God in the religious sense. In a nation that is overwhelmingly Christian, this is almost concrete proof that high level enlightenment in science is incompatible, or at least less achievable, with a religious world-view.
Now I profess to be an atheist but I do not take it upon myself to actively persuade people into “converting”. I think people, even Pastafarians and Scientologists, should have the right to believe in what they want to. But it is not unreasonable for me to demand that such beliefs remain personal to those who hold them and be kept out of my life. In today’s America, making such a demand in public is tantamount to career suicide.
The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Like the African Americans and the homosexuals of the 20th century, American atheists today are discriminated against on a scale unimaginable in most developed European nation. Hell, even the Church of FSM probably gets treated better because apparently in America, belief in any divine supreme being is better than believing in nothing. According to a recent poll, all other factors held equal, more Americans will rather vote for a homosexual or black candidate than an atheist one.
Keep in mind that 80% of American scientists, who are a good representation of the intelligentsia, are atheists and then compare that to the fact that not a single elected politician in America has publicly declared himself/herself to be atheist, we are left with a very unpleasant conclusion: successful American politicians are either liars or idiots. This is clearly not a healthy political environment for the world’s superpower to be in. When will the civil rights movement for the oppressed American atheists come? Will it ever? That is one of the most important questions upon which the future of America’s progress as a nation built on democracy will depend on.
In a recent issue, Captain America died. The superhero who best represented the American spirit is dead. Again the cynical side of us know that Marvel is just trying to make some quick bucks off a character death and he may not even stay dead for long. But still, I find it symbolic and at the very least it manages to stir up some emotions that have been within every one of us who once looked up to America and saw greatness.
Captain America.
But just like how dead superheroes never stay dead, America still has some life left in it. It is not hard to return America back to where it belongs. It took one President to destroy America’s legacy. It will just take another one to restore it. And there is only one candidate who is up for the job.
So if you are American…
PLEASE VOTE FOR
Thank you. You will be much appreciated by the rest of the world.
Disclaimer: I am just a Singaporean teenager. Ideologically speaking, I am neither Democrat nor Republican. I have nothing to gain (except possibly as a member of humankind) from Ron Paul becoming President.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
I’m shocked. I thought all this time you were a devout Haruhiist. It is a sad day for Haruhiism when one of its purportedly greatest believers publicly denounces his faith.
Remember, polls show that anime fans are, all other factors equal, more likely to read the blog of a deranged GE player or an insane figure collector than an anti-haruhiist.
Time to kiss that Google cheque goodbye… :D
July 5th, 2007 at 9:13 pm
> according to a recent study in American Scientist,
> an overwhelming 80% of the leading scientists
> in American are strict atheist and only 5% holds
> a traditional view of God in the religious sense.
i checked the article you refer to, and it says:
“Graffin and Provine’s study, called the Cornell Evolution Project, evaluated the results of a questionnaire returned by 149 leading evolutionary scientists about their religious beliefs. Eighty percent of evolutionary scientists were strict atheists.”
so they are ‘leading evolutionary scientists’ not ‘leading scientists’. big difference.
i’m not saying that the most of the leading american scientists are not atheists, only that the article you refer to does not prove what you’re saying.
except this problem, i generally agree with what you’re saying btw.
p.s: would be great to add a preview-comment option to your blog.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:26 pm
I think I would never vote an atheist into office at this point, simply because God knows what an atheist politician would do. (/joke) Your everyday Judeo-Christian politicians have their track records, and it’s pretty obvious as to why a lot of them profess their faiths that way. While as politicians, some are more honest and sincere than others, but the tenants of atheism isn’t automatically humanist, where as such underpinning is a requirement of your traditional major religions (sans maybe Islam).
Perhaps a weak agnostic humanist candidate, I can support.
Lastly you are just outright wrong about persecution of homosexuals in the US. It’s still pretty bad. Atheists have it easy.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:38 pm
Ops I guess I screwed up there. Hmmm but I’m pretty sure Richard
Dawkins quoted similar statistics in a speech he gave at TED… just can’t find them now. Oh well.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Omo, it seems weird to me for someone to claim that atheists are not automatically humanist. I think that is obvious because the two has nothing to do with one another. Similarly, it’s just as weird to say that a person is humanist just because he/she claims to practise a religion.
I think the greatest fallacy committed by most Americans is that religions and morality are related.
Religions are responsible for some good things in the world. But please do not claim that those good things cannot exist without religion or that religions are responsible for only the good things.
Anyway, since there is a significant portion of atheists and agnostics in America, then it follows that there must be at least some representation in government for them. Yet no one in Congress admits to being one. Why? Because American voters think like you do and politicians are forced to lie about being Christian to get voted into office. But apparently that is good enough for you because anyone claiming to be religious is a humanist in your eyes.
Lastly, I didn’t say homosexuals are treated better than atheists. I said more people would rather have one for President.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:51 pm
“Paul advocates a strictly limited role for the federal government, low taxes, free markets, a non-interventionist foreign policy, the abolition of the income tax and the Internal Revenue Service, a return to monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency, gun ownership, and an end to drug prohibition. He opposes abortion, capital punishment, gay marriage, and federal influence on education.” (from Wikipedia)
Abolition of the IRS and income tax? Return to hard money? Gun ownership(which you oppose, I think)?
Yikes.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:52 pm
I can’t vote for that man because we need to go as far away from the republican agenda as possible to counter the effects of bush and cheney’s prolonged assumption of power.
July 5th, 2007 at 9:55 pm
He wants to abolish the IRS and income tax on a federal level because he believes that a federal income tax is unconstitutional. Individual states are free to collect taxes. The constitution and libertarian ideologies are the basis for almost all of his opinions on various issues.
There are certain issues which I disagree with him on, but at least he is honest about his stands. He has a consistent voting record for his whole political career and he doesn’t change his fundamental beliefs just because of public opinions. He is the only Republican candidate who voted against the Iraq War when it was first proposed.
As for issues relevant to my interests… He supports Net Neutrality and is against Internet regulation. He is against military interventions. He wants to legalize drugs. He recognizes habeas corpus. He is personally religious, opposes gay marriages and opposes abortions BUT he believes that the federal government should make no laws to govern them and he is right. And, best of all, he said all this without looking at the public opinion poll every 5 seconds.
July 5th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
The entire idea of Separation of Church and State was to prevent another Church of England from springing up in the newly formed USA. It was not designed to be a clear, black and white division between religion and government. The majority of the Founding Fathers were devout Christians, and even those who were not religious, eg. Thomas Jefferson was a Deist - iirc the correct term but, anyways that train of thought believed in a superior being that set everything up much like pocket watch or clock, wound it up, set everything into motion, and watches what happens… in other words people have a certain degree of free will, recognized the importance up a government based on Christian values. Read the Constitution, if you haven’t already, and make sure to note in the early parts the religious references and language.
To say Atheists get little respect in the USA is ridiculous, you obviously haven’t kept up with what the ACLU has been doing. At one point an atheist pretty much got the Pledge of Allegiance declared unconstitutional for a while in Federal Circuit Court because it had the phrase “…one nation under God…”
July 5th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
Ironically how the UK, with the Church being an official state organ, ended up being a whole lot less obsessed with religion than the US.
Anyway, I am not saying atheists are being lynched or anything, but can you deny the fact that atheists are getting sidelined in America? Strict atheists and mild atheists (aka agnostics) are the second largest demographic in America, way bigger than Jews. But just take a look at the political representation and the relative lobbying powers…
It’s one thing for the court to decide that the African American students must be admitted into school. It’s an entirely different thing to say that African Americans receive “respect”.
On a side note, it’s quite a different thing when someone claimed to be religious over 200 years ago. Just a century earlier, Galileo was getting flamed for heliocentrism and science could only operate under religious consent. It was a religious world and even non-believers profess to be Christians. I believe that if those men were born today, they would be atheists.